By: Gord
QUITE RIGHT : The expectation of no further programme changes is foolish. Tax rates and benefit rates are dictated all too often by the need to get re-elected or party ideology rather than the...
View ArticleBy: randy deminick
take it at 60 like i did. one cannot predict the future in health or finances
View ArticleBy: Andrew
Thoughtful analysis. For my part I am particularly concerned about the increasing proportion of private investments, which are by their nature almost completely opaque both as to market value and...
View ArticleBy: A.G. Zimmerman
Quite true. The good rate of return on investments would seem to be a result of assuming greater risk, such as ownership of real estate built out over the harbour in Australia. But how many Canadians...
View ArticleBy: Jimbo
I plan to take it at 60. (I retired at 50) Two reasons.. 1. Uncertainty in Govt. policy as stated here. 2. Uncertainty in longevity…..you may never make back the money you gave up by waiting if you...
View ArticleBy: D
“yet there has been discussion about potential reduction income level where OAS claw-backs kick in.” I’ve been advocating this for years. You say it’s being discussed? Where?
View ArticleBy: peter benedek
I don’t recall specific sources, but I just did a web search on the subject and I quickly located a few mentions of the suject. Examples from papers and the blogosphere can be found at:...
View Article
